39

charities, each checked against its IRS filings and Charity Navigator record

$1.25B

spent a year between them, from a food bank to a single neighborhood pantry

0%

taken by GiveChi. Every Donate button goes straight to the charity

All 39 charities.

Every charity here was checked on September 20, 2026. Open one for why it matters, its numbers and every caution.

Food and basic needs 6

Literacy and education 7

Housing and homelessness 7

Violence prevention and youth 6

Health 2

  • Erie Family Health Centers

    Community health centers, regardless of ability to pay

    to programs
    86.2%
    spent a year
    $111M
    Donate to Erie Family Health Centers, opens eriefamilyhealth.org in a new tab
  • Howard Brown Health

    Health center focused on LGBTQ+ patients

    • Finances

      FY2024 deficit of about $4.9M and three to four years of management-described operating shortfalls. No going-concern warning, against $124.6M in net assets. Down from 11 locations in 2019 to seven.

    • Labor record

      December 2022: 65 positions cut, citing a $12M shortfall. January 2023: roughly 440 employees struck for three days. July 2023: the National Labor Relations Board found unfair labor practices. May 2024: a contract was ratified after the CEO resigned, and two clinics closed. July 2024: 43 more layoffs, about 7% of staff, which the interim CEO described as the third consecutive year of an operating shortfall. November 2024: a $1.108M NLRB settlement covering 55 laid-off workers. A new CEO was named in February 2025 and no labor actions have been found since.

    to programs
    87.9%
    spent a year
    $212M
    Donate to Howard Brown Health, opens donate.howardbrown.org in a new tab

Women and survivors 3

Environment and land 3

How we check.

Each charity was checked on September 20, 2026 against its IRS Form 990, its Charity Navigator record and its own reports, and every donation link was opened to confirm it works. Nothing here is paid for, and nothing is ranked on a single score.

How it’s made

GiveChi is generated with AI and overseen by Cody Heart. Claude, an AI model made by Anthropic, gathered the records, wrote the summaries and built the site. Cody Heart sets its direction and reviews the work.

AI can get things wrong. Each charity’s details link to the filings and sources behind its figures, so check the ones that matter to you before a large gift.

What the numbers mean

To programs
The share of spending that goes to programs, averaged over three years. The median here is 82.0%. It shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
Charity Navigator score
A Charity Navigator score is built from up to four separate assessments, called beacons. Almost every organization here has completed only one of them — Accountability & Finance, which measures financial disclosure and governance. It says nothing about whether the programs work. A 100/100 means the books are clean and public, and no more than that.
Spent a year
Total expenses from the latest readable filing. Size measures reach.
Result
Revenue minus expenses in that year. A deficit is shown in red and explained under Worth knowing.

Evidence

  • Randomized trial

    Tested against a control group. The strongest evidence available for social programs.

  • Independent study

    Evaluated by an outside researcher. Includes studies the organization commissioned itself.

  • Self-reported

    Counted by the organization itself. No outside evaluation of the program’s effect is on file here.

Cautions

Every note on the record stays in. The ones that bear most on a gift (finances, funding risk, labor record) show on the cards; the rest wait in each charity’s details.

Questions

How were these organizations checked?
Each one was checked on September 20, 2026 against its IRS Form 990, its Charity Navigator record and its own reports, and every donation link was opened to confirm it works. A Chicago charity missing from this list has not been judged.
What do the evidence tags mean?
Randomized trial: the program was tested against a control group, the strongest proof that it works. Independent study: an outside researcher evaluated it. Self-reported: the organization counts its own results.
How much of my donation reaches programs?
Between 62 and 98 percent here, shown for every charity as a three-year average. It shows how spending is classified, and the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
Are donations tax deductible?
For 37 of the 39, yes, if you itemize. Chicago CRED is a private operating foundation with different deduction limits, and gifts to Chicago Votes are deductible only through its Education Fund, which this page links. Each entry lists its EIN.
Why is there no overall ranking?
Financial ratios, ratings and program evidence measure different things, and one combined score would invent precision. The picker ranks by one priority at a time, and you choose which.
How current is this information?
Checked on September 20, 2026. Financial figures come from each organization’s latest readable filing: FY2025 for fourteen, FY2024 for nineteen and FY2023 for six.

Sources

If a link is dead or a figure is wrong, it gets fixed.